Online dating email response rate christelijke dating site reformatorisch dagblad
When women open emails that look long and bulky paragraphs, they tend to just skip to the next message. Suppose you were to approach a woman at a bar with your head down and said to her, “So umm, I really think you are beautiful.
If you are interested, I really would love to talk to you.” Would a beautiful woman who is in high demand want to engage with you? The body language and wording shows a complete lack of confidence.
Inexplicably pegged to Women’s History Month, the study spins the data as “a woman’s advantage,” since women who first message men have a better chance of getting a response than men who first message women.
Such is the gender dynamic that’s played out in courtship, both online and offline, for generations.
Data shows that people are more likely to read things that are divided into very small paragraphs.
There’s Bumble, where men can only respond to messages initiated by women, and Wyldfire, an app that only admits men who’ve been invited by a woman, creating a kind of firewall to keep out creeps.
(Neither have attracted the critical mass of daters that’s essential to a dating platform’s utility.) With this week’s study, Ok Cupid is trying a similar approach: Persuade women to make the first move and they’ll be more active on the site, which will get men, who’ll receive more messages, to stick around.
Women love men who ooze confidence and appear to be in high demand so you need to write in a manner that reflects this.
Avoid phrases such as, “I hope to hear from you,” or “if you are interested,” and use language that reveals you are confident.